人工智能的飞速发展正以前所未有的速度重塑科技格局，而在这场竞赛的核心，是对“通用人工智能”（AGI）的追求。然而，AGI不仅是技术上的圣杯，它也深刻地触及到商业合作的敏感神经。最近浮出水面的一则消息暗示，OpenAI一份未公开发表的内部研究，正与其重要伙伴微软之间产生摩擦，原因竟是这份研究对AGI能力等级的划分。
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence is reshaping the technological landscape at an unprecedented pace, with the pursuit of “Artificial General Intelligence” (AGI) at the core of this race. However, AGI is not only a technological holy grail; it also profoundly touches the sensitive nerves of business partnerships. Recent news suggests that an unpublished internal study from OpenAI is creating friction with its key partner, Microsoft, reportedly due to the study’s framework for classifying levels of AGI capabilities.
据报道，这份题为《通用人工智能能力的五个等级》的论文，为AI技术从早期阶段到完全成熟的AGI构建了一个分类框架。问题的关键在于，这份论文中对未来AI能力的具体界定，可能使其难以在当前阶段宣布达到AGI，而根据OpenAI与微软的协议，是否达到AGI是触发某些合作条款的关键节点，甚至可能影响微软的股权比例。
According to reports, this paper, titled “Five Levels of General AI Capabilities,” establishes a classification framework for AI technology from early stages to fully mature AGI. The crux of the issue is that the specific definitions of future AI capabilities within this paper could make it difficult for OpenAI to declare that it has reached AGI at the current stage. Under the agreement between OpenAI and Microsoft, achieving AGI is a critical trigger point for certain contractual clauses and could even affect Microsoft’s equity stake.
紧张关系围绕着对AGI实现时间表的不同看法。有消息指出，OpenAI曾考虑基于一个AI编码代理的表现来援引合同中关于AGI的条款，但其内部论文的存在，对这种“宣告”构成了潜在的挑战。微软显然对此持保留态度，这场围绕AGI定义权展开的博弈，凸显了在快速发展的技术领域，连最基础的概念都可能成为商业谈判的焦点。
The tension revolves around differing views on the AGI timeline. Sources indicate that OpenAI had considered invoking the AGI clause in the contract based on the performance of an AI coding agent, but the existence of its internal paper poses a potential challenge to such a “declaration.” Microsoft apparently holds reservations, and this game of contention over the right to define AGI highlights how, in the rapidly evolving tech landscape, even the most fundamental concepts can become focal points in business negotiations.
这份未公开的论文就像一颗投入合作湖面的石子，激起了层层涟漪。它不仅关乎技术本身的进展，更深层次地反映了科技巨头在AI赛道上复杂的利益纠葛与话语权争夺。AGI的定义不再是纯粹的学术问题，而是带有明确商业议程的战略工具。未来，随着AI能力的不断逼近，如何界定、何时承认AGI的到来，将持续考验着合作伙伴的信任与协议的弹性。
This unpublished paper acts like a stone dropped into the lake of partnership, creating ripples. It concerns not only the progress of technology itself but, more deeply, reflects the complex entanglement of interests and the struggle for influence among tech giants in the AI race. The definition of AGI is no longer a purely academic matter; it is a strategic tool with a clear commercial agenda. Moving forward, as AI capabilities continue to approach, how AGI is defined and when its arrival is acknowledged will continuously test the trust between partners and the flexibility of agreements.
发表回复